Jennifer West and Jacco Olivier use film and video in unusual ways. While Olivier creates animations from his vivid paintings, West uses a variety of strange materials, (from pennyroyal tea to mascara) to create her “direct films.” A direct film is not constructed (or “shot”) by a camera but rather created as the artist exposes the film to various elements. West’s direct films also have an unconventional performative element that sets her works apart in today’s “touchless” digital frontier. West uses everyday materials to comment on pop culture—particularly that of her California culture—from surfing to Nirvana. Olivier’s animations are, on the other hand, made from loosely painting a narrative—continually painting and repainting the surface of his canvases until he completes his concept, and every step is recorded by/on camera. While each artist has a different process, they are both utilizing bright, hypnotic color and painterly actions in the creation of their films/animations. As Olivier’s works come from continual constructions of everyday life upon and unstable “canvas,” West is systematically altering her filmstrips with unusual chemicals to give the viewer a visual, sensual experience of the elements in her work. These concepts range from a physical assault of the film leader to covering it in materials that were a part of the movie’s treatment, whether that material was tasted, smelled, or referenced in context of the film.
Both artists are contemplating the ordinary in the films Dawn Surf Jelly Bowl (16 mm film negative sanded with surfboard shaping tools, sex wax melted on, squirted, dripped, splashed, sprayed and rubbed with donuts, zinc oxide, cuervo, sunscreen, hydrogen peroxide, tecate, sand, tar, scraped with a shark’s tooth, edits made by the surf and a seal while film floated in waves…) by West and Stumble by Olivier. These films are studies of the everyday, which in Olivier’s case involves a day in the life of a bug; West’s recalls surfing and the hedonistic California lifestyle (her home state). Though these are the basic premises for their pieces, their ability to capture the ordinary makes a great impact. West’s 2011 film is meant to evoke early surfing films that were made for surfers before the field was commercialized, and all of the elements in the title were used in creating the film to give it multiple sensory components that reflect surfing culture. Stumble (2009), on the other hand, is a series of paintings of a bug in different times of the day as it struggles on its back—trying to and eventually turning over as the sound of crickets play gently in the background. An upturned bug is a common sight, one that is easily overlooked until it is playing on the screen. Stumble might thus refer to the human condition: our inevitable series of downfalls and recoveries. All the while, the series of paintings are vividly colorful—evoking West’s use of saturated color, and the processing that these pieces embody to translate the everyday into reflections upon culture, sentiment, and the human condition.
The first time I walked into Vibha Galhotra’s exhibition, Metropia, I was taken aback by the colossal size of her works. The immense tapestry-like “Veils” and sculptures are formed with ghungroos: tiny metal bells that Indian dancers wear during performances. Bringing these two elements together—the ghungroos and the size of the works—is a visual marriage that creates a powerful message about the effects that rapid building in New Delhi has had on the city, its history, and environmental issues. The massive scale of her work evokes the modern buildings of New Delhi while the ghungroos suggest the citizens affected by the development of the city. The shining metal of the ghungroos, which are quite reflective in the light, could embody new construction while also representing cultural tradition. The ghungroos almost create a visual sound as if, when you look at the piece, you can hear the bells ringing in a way that mimics the hustle rapid pace of city life.
Though the exhibition is filled with Galhotra’s “Veils” (abstract landscape tapestry-like landscapes made with ghungroos), I am going to discuss two of these objects from the exhibition that reflect her message. Landscape Remade depicts a cityscape in a triptych of three tapestries. Though the image is luminescent in the light, the use of the various colored metallic ghungroos is reminiscent of a pollution that plagues the city—turning the vibrancy of color associated with nature into a metallic grayscale. A crane pierces two of the tapestries, and the eye is drawn immediately to the ominous hook in the center of the tapestries. The buildings are overwhelmingly present, and there is no sense of nature in the piece, reminding the viewer of the change caused by erasure of the environment.
Another piece that is striking and sizable is called Dead Monster, the skin of a deflated bulldozer. Galhotra has created many “monsters” in protest of construction and damage done to the environment. Dead Monster is sprawled out across the floor as if defeated in battle, giving it a sense of hope for the future, as well as awareness. This sculpture is also made of ghungroos that evoke the metal of the bulldozer as well as the echoes of tradition. The idea of this bulldozer being “dead” represents its cold, lifeless quality as opposed to nature and comments on how such dead objects are haunting present life.
Though Galhotra works with ghungroos in a lot of her pieces, it is not her only medium. She also utilizes New Delhi to create art that informs her audiences of the pollution and the way that other people are affected by environmental neglect. Galhotra’s mixed media piece Sediment is a stunning work of abstraction. On closer look, one realizes that the medium she used to create this piece is collected waste from the Yamuna River, the largest tributary of the Ganges River (the most sacred river in India). Sediment is a mixture of beauty and shocking revelation, and it is a strong reminder of the pollution that people encounter, create, and ignore on a daily basis. Seeing the piece for the time and learning the medium reminded me of the environmental problems we all face and to be more aware of the consequences of pollution. Interestingly, Galhotra creates a visual dialogue between art and awareness, which makes this exhibit so enlightening.
Another piece that employs daily life in New Delhi as the medium is 15 Days of May. This work centers around a rope that was placed outside in the city to accumulate ambient dust and detritus that are present in the city for a period of fifteen days in May. As you look at the photographs of the rope before it was exposed to the dust and grime of the city, the ropes are clean and unmarked—making their shift to crusty gray innards all the more unsettling. These works are a reminder that we should be more proactive in taking care of the places in which we live, whether its New Delhi or Winston-Salem. What’s so interesting about Galhotra’s is that she creates art with materials and subject matter that people tend to ignore (or attempt to ignore) on a daily basis—bringing these issues to the forefront of our attention. Her works are a reminder that we should be aware of the environment in which we live while also calling to question what art can be. She gives ordinary—or even disgusting—objects a new context with a powerful message that is meant to make us think about ways in which we contribute to the destruction of our environment and ways in which, however simple, we can improve it. Metropia is on display at SECCA until Sunday, February 17, 2013.
Salisbury, NC-based artist Frank Selby’s exhibition, Misunderstanding, is showing at SECCA until February 17.th His painstaking attention to detail and highly naturalistic drawings copied from old press photographs are a testament to the decay of memory. This theme runs through all of his drawings and branches into other concepts on the failings of language, image, and how the two can distort the truth. On my first night in Winston-Salem I watched a documentary called Between the Folds (about the art and science of origami) and found that paper folding and Selby’s work have analogous principles. In the film, origami is compared to making memories and impressions in paper through folding. Once folded, the paper can never go back to its original state. Similarly, Selby demonstrates that the old photographs he copies are manipulated memories that not only physically decay with time but also lose their context through language and his own manipulation (cropping and resizing) of the photograph. This process continues until the moment originally “captured” has been skewed—making a statement unintended for the original work that cannot revert to its original state.
Selby replicates old photographs with precision, including all the flaws that accumulated during the shooting and developing processes as well as the inescapable disintegration caused by time and wear. To do so is to show that a photograph is not an absolute rendering of a moment. A photograph can be posed, cropped, resized, and damaged. He further distances his drawings from their intended meanings by giving them a title that removes the photo from its original context. Selby also resizes the photographs to re-scale the origin and meditate upon the intention of the photograph.
Selby states, “Every message is perverted from its inception in language and gains more distortion through each iteration and reproduction,” which gives us a sense of what his work is truly about. A prime example of his theories about language and communication is prevalent in the drawing stare into the lake astonished. The photograph he draws from is an appropriated, cropped image of Civil War soldiers overlooking a battlefield. Selby re-scaled this particular image to show two soldiers, but in the original, there is a group of soldiers posed on the right side of the photo who are supposed to be the focal point. His interventions are slight, but their affect is large. Selby is shepherding change, but not through his drawing technique as he attempts to make exact replicas of these photographs. Instead, he highlights the inverse relationship of trying to know and remember a moment or image by copying it—whether by hand or eye. His work is re-documenting the moment captured in the photograph as a semblance of a memory, and it is physically deteriorating in the same way that memory fades with time. Also, the title that Selby gives the piece—stare into the lake astonished—gives the subjects (and the indiscernible background) a new context since in the photograph, it appears as though the figures are looking onto a battlefield. This piece exemplifies Selby’s desire to demonstrate the misleading nature of language as well as image, furthering the idea that image generates miscommunication.
Selby’s exhibition, Misunderstanding, was given its nomenclature because all of Selby’s works, in one way or another, are intentionally meant to be misunderstood. We are meant to misunderstand the image because he re-presents the image in such a way that ultimately subverts the concept that photography shows truth and that one can use language to create an imagined context for any image.
Last week, I had the opportunity to select works from twenty-five new artists to restock SECCA’s Art-o-Mat. For those of you who haven’t heard of Art-o-Mat, it is local Winston-Salem artist Clark Whittington’s project that brings art to the community. The Art-o-Mat began in 1997 when Whittington refurbished a prohibited cigarette machine in which he sold his photography rather than cigarettes, and put it in a local café with one of his shows. Since then, the idea has only expanded. Fifteen and a half years later, his project has grown to include about four hundred participating artists from ten different countries, and his machines are spread out across the US. They have even made their way to other countries.
I had never heard of Art-o-Mat before I arrived at SECCA, but I’m already a huge fan. I love that the Art-o-Mat is a way to make art accessible and amusing, and it gives artists all over the world a chance to reach a wider audience. At the same time, it reminds us that art can be found anywhere, can be created out of anything, and comes in many shapes and sizes. Not to mention the idea of recycling old, seemingly useless materials (well in this case, the size and shape of cigarette packs) to create art and give something back to the community is a fantastic concept.
Steven and I arrived at Clark’s studio to pick out the newest artists to add to the SECCA Art-o-Mat and found two friendly dogs as well as shelves upon shelves of cigarette pack-sized works of art. My task was a little daunting at first, but the slight anxiety I was experiencing transformed into delight as I browsed over all of the pieces. Still, only picking out twenty-five pieces was no easy task. There were so many great artists from which to choose.
I wanted to select a variety of types of artworks for the SECCA Art-o-Mat. I selected paintings, prints, and mixed media pieces as well as more eccentric artworks such as “Lost and Found Jewelry,” screen printed bandanas, rock art (literally), and sculpture.
Two popular artists and their artworks are making reappearances. Kill Taupe’s Bunnies and Dewitt Young’s Young Capacitor Dudes will be back in the SECCA Art-o-Mat. Taupe’s ironic bunnies and Dewitt’s charming robots will bring a smile to your face. Apparently they run out quickly, so snatch them up while you can! We are also including local Winston-Salem artist Mona Wu’s Lino Prints: tiny linographs of flowers, vegetables, and boats. Jodi Hoover’s Little Monsters are sure to be popular as well. These creatures are far more cute than frightening. I also chose less traditional art works by Martha Schermerhorn. Schermerhorn’s Personal Passion Dolls—little, multicolored paper dolls that hang from a string—present messages of empowerment. I would love to write about the remaining artists—there are many more great ones to talk about—but this post would be too long and, of course, I wouldn’t want to completely ruin the element of surprise. Think of it as another one of the many reasons why you should give SECCA a visit.
I’d like to take home every last piece, but don’t worry, I’ll save some for you. Here is the link to the Art-o-Mat website: http://www.artomat.org/. You can find a machine near you, look at some of the artists participating in this project, and maybe even get involved yourself!
The Anne Kesler Shields exhibition is particularly meaningful to me because I attend her alma mater: the great Hollins University, from which she graduated in 1954. If one were to visit Hollins and peruse the halls of the Richard Wetherill Visual Art Center (the home of our studio art majors) one can see that social and political themes are highly prevalent in many students’ works. It is a part of the Hollins tradition, and we are indebted to Anne Kesler Shields and other Hollins alumnae in the art world for questioning societal roles and politics and passing this custom along. This exhibition ends Sunday, January 13th, so if you haven’t gone to this illuminating retrospective, you still have a few days left to see it! Believe me, it’s worth it.
The exhibition encompasses and celebrates Shield’s wide range of style, media and subject matter. Though the variety in her work is expansive, there is an apparent interest in color and utilizing color to create strong, bold statements which develop and change with her practice.
Some of her earlier pieces that received national acclaim were bright geometric paintings that focused on exploring tension and opposition between principles of shape and color to create a cohesive image. For example, the painting Blue Quartet is a dialogue between these two elements and how the opposing nature of each element can create striking harmony. Shields uses complementary colors—blue and red—to create a near psychedelic tension. The blue and red make each other more vibrant, drawing the eye towards both and leaving the viewer without a focal point. She similarly discards an apparent focal point through her use of shape. Shields employs a diamond shaped canvas to create a tension with the blue dots that form organic shapes. Therefore, both color and geometry are working together to create a tension that makes this piece entrancing.
Earlier in her career, Shields’ pieces were centered on such color and geometric forms, but as she grew artistically she began to use color to subtly reinforce her social and political statements. Towards the end of her career, Shields was working almost exclusively with found imagery (images from art history and modern media) to juxtapose them and create a dialogue that reveals pertinent themes in art history. These themes are still widely prevalent in contemporary life, particularly themes of violence and perceptions of women. This condition is exemplified in her collage, Bougereau Revisited, which overlays an academic painting with a contemporary, media-driven image. The photocopies in the collage highlight each other and remind us that though much time has gone by between the creation of the photograph and painting, at their elemental level the depictions of women are virtually the same. It is a reminder that problematic viewpoints and images of women still exist today and are reinforced by implicit languages.
Another piece that articulates her use of color and geometry to make a social statement is Return of the Sabine. This collage fuses contemporary images of masculine violence in sports (etc.) and women with the famous painting The Intervention of the Sabine Women by the neoclassical painter Jaques Louis David (1748-1825). Shields uses color and geometric form to bridge the images into a unified work of art. She breaks up all of the photos and the painting into rectangular facets that are integrated with one another to create the final piece. Solid blocks of color are interspersed throughout the conglomeration that mimic the colors and tonality in David’s painting, breaking up the black and white of the contemporary photographs while simultaneously pulling them into the collage. This highlights their lack of color and the discrepancy between the times in which the photographs were taken and the painting was completed while also making apparent the connection between the images of male violence and the somewhat passive figures of the women. Through this piece, Shields is commenting on the continuing objectification of women as well as violence.
These are only three examples of the many works that demonstrate Shields’ command over color and geometric form, which are of crucial importance to most of her work. When color and shape are not at the forefront of the meaning of the piece, they are still serving to present her social and political statements. Anne Kesler Shields: 50-Year Retrospective allows us to see the ways in which Shields developed and honed her art to create subject matter that is controversial and thought provoking as well as beautiful and seductive.
Hello all, my name is Johnna Henry, and I’m excited to be working at SECCA as an intern for the month of January. I hail from Jackson, Mississippi and am a sophomore at Hollins University in Roanoke, VA: a small women’s college right off the Blue Ridge Parkway. It’s my first time in Winston-Salem and SECCA, and I have really felt at home on this beautiful campus, though it’s only my second day here.
I’m an Art History and Creative Writing double major, and the more I study both fields, the more I find that they go hand in hand. I’m looking forward to utilizing both of my passions over the month. I’m not quite as well versed in contemporary art as I am with previous art historical periods, but a few contemporary artists I enjoy include William Kentridge, Cai Guo-Qiang, Kiki Smith, and Wolfgang Laib. All of these artists employ various (and strange) media in their art making processes—from charcoal and gunpowder, to pollen and wax—and their facility with these media is extremely powerful.
From what I know about contemporary art, I love that the boundaries of art are constantly being stretched while simultaneously leaving us with an important message. I hope to continue to discover more of this over the next month. I’ve been intrigued by contemporary art since high school but have yet to come across it in depth in my Art History education. Luckily for me, there are three great exhibitions that I can study and write about: Anne Kesler Shields: 50-Year Retrospective, Vibha Galhotra: Metropia, and Frank Selby: Misunderstanding, so watch out for some writing on these three fantastic, thought-provoking artists!
Hello, my name is Michael Blackmon, and I recently began interning at SECCA.
Art, as most people know, can take on a variety of forms. There’s musical art, performance art, etc. and the greatest thing about whatever form of art you encounter, is that you get to form your own perspective of what the artist was/is trying to convey.
For example, think about the film Titanic starring Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio. This is a film that most people have seen, and the cultural impact of the movie is so enormous that even if you haven’t seen it, you know a good bit about the film.
Anyway, if you remember, the over-arching theme of the film was about love, but there were other themes that were constant throughout the film like individuality, freedom, and sexuality. Film is an art form, and like many other art forms, there’s rarely one message being conveyed. Most people who saw the film probably only left with the notion that this was a movie just another love story, but it wasn’t. All you have to do is look a little deeper than what’s presented at the surface and come up with your own interpretation of what a particular art piece is saying to you.
When I first visited SECCA, I was intrigued by Publish or Perish, a piece by Kiel Johnson. The artist, Johnson, created a printing press only using simple materials like paper, wood, and cardboard. On the printing paper are little figures that were hand drawn. Upon closer inspection, you’ll see that the figures on the paper are everyday items that people like you and I own. What Johnson did was draw every single possession he owned on the printing paper. Johnson’s father was a newspaper publisher so it’s obvious where his inspiration for this particular piece stems from.
To me, Johnson’s printing press is, in some ways, a beautiful tribute to those who have ever enjoyed the comfort of reading and writing. Think about it: The printing press allowed for reading materials to be mass produced, thus allowing more people to be informed about one subject – mass communication.
Johnson’s piece is also reflective because we’re entering an era of uncertainty as far as writing is concerned. There will always be writers, no doubt, but what will their messages be printed on? Everything is becoming digital. More and more print journalists are out of work every day; even books come in electronic format now.
In all, Johnson’s printing press is a wonderful reminder of the transformative nature of how thoughts and ideas were communicated.